<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Doggetto.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.doggetto.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.doggetto.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:14:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Problems with Polyandry and Problems with Feminism by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.doggetto.com/2011/01/problems-with-polyandry-are-problems-with-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.doggetto.com/?p=642#comment-641</guid>
		<description>Harold Glen Clark was the first temple president of the newly completed Provo Temple.  He was sealed to Virginia Driggs in 1929, and she died in 1950.  He  was then sealed to Mary Deane Peterson Gilbert in 1950.  (Bro. Clark didn&#039;t waste any time finding another wife.)  He died in 1980.  The interesting thing is that Mary Dean Peterson was first sealed to Arthur Gene Gilbert in 1941.  Bro. Gilbert died, so at the time she was “sealed” to Bro. Clark in 1950, she was already sealed and living.  This is in direct violation of the temple sealing policies of today.  Then, after Bro. Clark, dies in 1984, she marries a third time to Glenn Andrew in 1986. He dies in 2004, then she dies in 2006, and they were sealed by proxy in 2009.  So Mary Dean Peterson is sealed to three husbands.  How did she get away with being sealed to two men at the same time while living?  Ibet there are a lot of other instances of living women being sealed to two men at the same time if we were able to open up the records and look.  I only know that it hasn&#039;t been allowed since 1998, but it may have been allowed in earlier times.  It&#039;s amazing what you can find on NewFamilySearch.org!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harold Glen Clark was the first temple president of the newly completed Provo Temple.  He was sealed to Virginia Driggs in 1929, and she died in 1950.  He  was then sealed to Mary Deane Peterson Gilbert in 1950.  (Bro. Clark didn&#8217;t waste any time finding another wife.)  He died in 1980.  The interesting thing is that Mary Dean Peterson was first sealed to Arthur Gene Gilbert in 1941.  Bro. Gilbert died, so at the time she was “sealed” to Bro. Clark in 1950, she was already sealed and living.  This is in direct violation of the temple sealing policies of today.  Then, after Bro. Clark, dies in 1984, she marries a third time to Glenn Andrew in 1986. He dies in 2004, then she dies in 2006, and they were sealed by proxy in 2009.  So Mary Dean Peterson is sealed to three husbands.  How did she get away with being sealed to two men at the same time while living?  Ibet there are a lot of other instances of living women being sealed to two men at the same time if we were able to open up the records and look.  I only know that it hasn&#8217;t been allowed since 1998, but it may have been allowed in earlier times.  It&#8217;s amazing what you can find on NewFamilySearch.org!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Producing a Faux-WordPress Plugin for Symfony, Part II by URL Twitter</title>
		<link>http://blog.doggetto.com/2010/02/producing-a-faux-wordpress-plugin-for-symfony-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>URL Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.doggetto.com/?p=524#comment-640</guid>
		<description>This is great! Well thought out, do you have other posts too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great! Well thought out, do you have other posts too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Symfony sfConfig Variables by Sudhakar</title>
		<link>http://blog.doggetto.com/2009/06/symfony-sfconfig-variables/comment-page-1/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>Sudhakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.doggetto.com/?p=3#comment-625</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using symfony for nearly 2 months, and i found many new &#039;sf&#039; to me here. Thanks. Also you can create your own by a custom function in ProjectConfiguration.class.php file as =&gt;
public function setWebDir($webDir){
sfConfig::set(&#039;sf_my_new_dir&#039;, $webDir. DIRECTORY_SEPERATOR.&#039;uploads&#039;.DIRECTORY_SEPERATOR.&#039;resume&#039;);
}//end
you can set(like above) or add(for array) or clear(for dejecte entire sf) or get(set and get) or has(to check).
.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using symfony for nearly 2 months, and i found many new &#8216;sf&#8217; to me here. Thanks. Also you can create your own by a custom function in ProjectConfiguration.class.php file as =&gt;<br />
public function setWebDir($webDir){<br />
sfConfig::set(&#8216;sf_my_new_dir&#8217;, $webDir. DIRECTORY_SEPERATOR.&#8217;uploads&#8217;.DIRECTORY_SEPERATOR.&#8217;resume&#8217;);<br />
}//end<br />
you can set(like above) or add(for array) or clear(for dejecte entire sf) or get(set and get) or has(to check).<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How I Use Netbeans 6.8 and Symfony 1.2 by Stas</title>
		<link>http://blog.doggetto.com/2010/01/how-i-use-netbeans-6-8-and-symfony-1-2/comment-page-1/#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>Stas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 09:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.doggetto.com/?p=473#comment-624</guid>
		<description>I use free PHP IDE &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.codelobster.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Codelobster PHP Edition&lt;/a&gt;. It has special plug-in for Symfony framework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use free PHP IDE <a href="http://www.codelobster.com" rel="nofollow">Codelobster PHP Edition</a>. It has special plug-in for Symfony framework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Symfony sfConfig Variables by surya kant</title>
		<link>http://blog.doggetto.com/2009/06/symfony-sfconfig-variables/comment-page-1/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>surya kant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.doggetto.com/?p=3#comment-607</guid>
		<description>It is very interesting tutorial for the symfony  biggners</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very interesting tutorial for the symfony  biggners</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Problems with Polyandry and Problems with Feminism by NoCoolName_Tom</title>
		<link>http://blog.doggetto.com/2011/01/problems-with-polyandry-are-problems-with-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>NoCoolName_Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.doggetto.com/?p=642#comment-606</guid>
		<description>Also, I was less interested in problems of the doctrine in general and more in how Church members&#039; currently complementarian viewpoint affects how discomforting the idea of polyandry can be and how an egalitarian viewpoint can help to soften that blow.  Exploring the ramifications of how polyandrous sealings change or don&#039;t change modern Mormonism&#039;s view of polygynous sealings would be very interesting indeed, but that would be an entirely different post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I was less interested in problems of the doctrine in general and more in how Church members&#8217; currently complementarian viewpoint affects how discomforting the idea of polyandry can be and how an egalitarian viewpoint can help to soften that blow.  Exploring the ramifications of how polyandrous sealings change or don&#8217;t change modern Mormonism&#8217;s view of polygynous sealings would be very interesting indeed, but that would be an entirely different post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Problems with Polyandry and Problems with Feminism by NoCoolName_Tom</title>
		<link>http://blog.doggetto.com/2011/01/problems-with-polyandry-are-problems-with-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>NoCoolName_Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.doggetto.com/?p=642#comment-605</guid>
		<description>Personally, I just choose to believe that polygamy in the LDS Church has always been a human invention and that if God is just He will honor those plural marriages that were entered into through faith.  Nonetheless, I don&#039;t think there&#039;s any sort of celestial spousal &quot;stealing&quot; or &quot;swapping&quot; going on in Mormon doctrine and theology; I think it&#039;s quite clear that a sealing on earth is a sealing in heaven.  We don&#039;t have any case (as far as I&#039;m aware) of a woman being sealed simultaneously to more than one living man at a time (just married).  As for the rest, Mormon doctrine is notoriously silent on such issues as eternal family relationships and structure; it&#039;s all simply Church folklore and conjecture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I just choose to believe that polygamy in the LDS Church has always been a human invention and that if God is just He will honor those plural marriages that were entered into through faith.  Nonetheless, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any sort of celestial spousal &#8220;stealing&#8221; or &#8220;swapping&#8221; going on in Mormon doctrine and theology; I think it&#8217;s quite clear that a sealing on earth is a sealing in heaven.  We don&#8217;t have any case (as far as I&#8217;m aware) of a woman being sealed simultaneously to more than one living man at a time (just married).  As for the rest, Mormon doctrine is notoriously silent on such issues as eternal family relationships and structure; it&#8217;s all simply Church folklore and conjecture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Problems with Polyandry and Problems with Feminism by Mithryn</title>
		<link>http://blog.doggetto.com/2011/01/problems-with-polyandry-are-problems-with-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>Mithryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.doggetto.com/?p=642#comment-604</guid>
		<description>I think this bothers me from an hierarchical perspective 

When I get to heaven; would this mean that my wife could be sealed to those who held more power?  Can anyone who is &quot;lower&quot; plurally marry a wife of someone who is &quot;higher&quot;, i.e. could I marry one of Brigham&#039;s wives, and have him be Ok about it; or is it just the top that get to skim the best wives off the bottom.

The revelations seem to indicate that the more righteous (i.e. the prophets and apostles, perhaps other GA&#039;s) are due to have more wives. 

For me personally, I find this terribly disturbing that I can live righteously, work hard, get to heaven and have my wife stolen.  I admit that I find it more disturbing than that she could have her husband stolen... but I&#039;m not sure it is just the patriarchical view in effect there, but perhaps because it is me, and not her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this bothers me from an hierarchical perspective </p>
<p>When I get to heaven; would this mean that my wife could be sealed to those who held more power?  Can anyone who is &#8220;lower&#8221; plurally marry a wife of someone who is &#8220;higher&#8221;, i.e. could I marry one of Brigham&#8217;s wives, and have him be Ok about it; or is it just the top that get to skim the best wives off the bottom.</p>
<p>The revelations seem to indicate that the more righteous (i.e. the prophets and apostles, perhaps other GA&#8217;s) are due to have more wives. </p>
<p>For me personally, I find this terribly disturbing that I can live righteously, work hard, get to heaven and have my wife stolen.  I admit that I find it more disturbing than that she could have her husband stolen&#8230; but I&#8217;m not sure it is just the patriarchical view in effect there, but perhaps because it is me, and not her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Problems with Polyandry and Problems with Feminism by Mari</title>
		<link>http://blog.doggetto.com/2011/01/problems-with-polyandry-are-problems-with-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.doggetto.com/?p=642#comment-603</guid>
		<description>I think being your sister for my entire life has prepared me well.  I didn&#039;t have any problems with this post.  As long as it is just me and my husband today, I can accept the church practices of long ago.  This doesn&#039;t make Joseph Smith any less of a prophet in my eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think being your sister for my entire life has prepared me well.  I didn&#8217;t have any problems with this post.  As long as it is just me and my husband today, I can accept the church practices of long ago.  This doesn&#8217;t make Joseph Smith any less of a prophet in my eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brigham Young&#8217;s Transfiguration by Media Markt</title>
		<link>http://blog.doggetto.com/2009/06/b-y-transfiguration/comment-page-1/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Markt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.doggetto.com/?p=232#comment-544</guid>
		<description>Hi  this article was very interesting for me. But it was really hard to find it with google.com. Maybe you should improve it with seo plugins for wordpress like WP seo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi  this article was very interesting for me. But it was really hard to find it with google.com. Maybe you should improve it with seo plugins for wordpress like WP seo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

